Sean “Diddy” Combs is taking decisive steps in his ongoing legal battle, filing a motion to accelerate the appellate process. This comes following convictions that have stirred national attention. The high-profile musician and entrepreneur seeks a swift resolution after being found guilty on two counts under the Mann Act.
In a recent filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Diddy’s attorney, Alexandra Shapiro, emphasized the need for a compressed timeline. The motion argues that delays could result in Diddy serving a substantial portion of his 50-month sentence before an appellate decision is reached. The urgency underscores broader questions about the pace and fairness of the judicial process for defendants facing serious charges.
On July 2, 2025, Diddy was convicted of two Mann Act violations. These laws prohibit transporting individuals across state lines for illicit sexual activity. He was acquitted of more serious allegations, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. These carried potentially harsher penalties.
Sentenced by Judge Arun Subramanian on October 3, 2025, Diddy received a 50-month prison term, five years of supervised release, and a $500,000 fine. His legal team acted quickly, filing an appeal just five days after the formal judgment on October 15. This showed a clear sign of their intent to move efficiently through the court system.
BREAKING: Sean “Diddy” Combs asks Appeals Court to fast-track his appeal..
Appellant’s Opening Brief and Appendix: due by December 23, 2025
Appellee’s Opposition Brief: due by February 20, 2026
Appellant’s Reply Brief: due by March 13, 2026
Oral argument: April 2026 pic.twitter.com/vuBVrGXpNL— Lauren Conlin (@conlin_lauren) October 29, 2025
Proposed Appeal Timeline
Shapiro’s filing lays out a suggested schedule for the appeal:
- December 23, 2025: Appellant’s Opening Brief and Appendix
- February 20, 2026: Appellee’s Opposition Brief
- March 13, 2026: Appellant’s Reply Brief
- April 2026: Oral arguments before the Second Circuit
The government has indicated no opposition, raising the likelihood of quick approval by the appellate panel.
Diddy’s attorneys also highlight the effect of his 14 months of prior detention on the appeal’s efficacy. They argue that a standard appellate process, often exceeding a year, could render any favorable outcome moot by the time a ruling is issued. The team further notes that Diddy may qualify for programs under the First Step Act and Residential Drug Abuse Program (RDAP). This adds layers of complexity to his legal path.
If the court approves the accelerated schedule, Diddy could see a decision by late 2026, potentially reshaping his legal status. Meanwhile, he remains in custody, awaiting the outcome of this pivotal fight.